Jump to content

Talk:CC Amfi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCC Amfi has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 1, 2012Good article nomineeListed

Würth Arena Hamar OL-Amfi

[edit]

It is probably clear that the Hamar OL-Amfi will be renamed the Würth Arena Hamar OL-Amfi from 16 November. http://www.h-a.no/?ModuleId=138321&articleView=true&tabId=82 and http://www.h-a.no/?ModuleId=136310&articleView=true&tabId=82--Repstad (talk) 19:41, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been able to verify this. The news links provided are dead, I cannot find any other news items referring to the issue, and the official web site does not refer to the arena as Würth. I have therefore not included it in the article. Arsenikk (talk) 11:49, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hamar Olympic Amphitheatre/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Resolute (talk · contribs) 02:15, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
General
  • Images are good
    • Though it is not required for GA status, Alternative text for the images is preferred
  • Sources look good
    • No concern with close paraphrasing, given nearly all links are in Norwegian
Lead
  • "Other mayor events held at..." - Typo? I presume that is supposed to be "major"?
Green tickY. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • As a general complaint, I've never really cared for listing one-off events as being tenants in the infobox. I won't suggest removal, just sharing a personal opinion.
Construction
  • Link Storhamar IL on first use
Green tickY. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "...but a research project coordinated by the Norwegian Institute of Technology make it possible to build the venue in wood." - Awkward statement. I assume that should just be "made it possible". It also makes me curious. Is the arena completely made of wood? If so, is that unusual in Norway?
Green tickY. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Facilities
  • "...Unlike Lillehammer and Gjøvik, Hamar only uses the interest and not of the capital of their funds..." - Also a bit awkward. Perhaps just strike "of"? "Hamar uses only the interest, not the capital, of their funds [to cover any deficit]"?
Green tickY. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "...75 meters (246 ft) wise ..." - Typo. Should be "wide"
Green tickY. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The venue has an official ice hockey spectator capacity for 6,091 spectators," - No need to say "spectators" twice. I would just remove the first use: "The venue has an official ice hockey capacity for 6,091 spectators"
Green tickY. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "During the 1994 Winter Olympics, Hamar Olympic Amphitheatre was used for figure skating and short track speed skating. It hosted 13 events, drawing an average of 5,554 spectators.[27] During the Olympics, Storhamar Ishall was used for warming up and training." - Second use of "During the Olympics" is redundant.
Green tickY. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Events
  • I am not sure that the Nancy Kerrigan/Tonya Harding incident is particularly relevant to this article
Maybe not the most relevant fact, but it's only half a sentence. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Ice hockey section, your uses of "Dragon's" should either be Dragons if speaking of the team in general, or Dragons' if referring to something the team possesses. i.e.: The Dragons' highest average... and The Dragons have played....
Green tickY. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Overall

A well written article overall. There are a few typos and a couple places where the wording is awkward, but you have touched on everything I would expect to see in an article about such a facility. I am placing this nomination on hold to give time to address the minor issues above. Regards, Resolute 02:15, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the review. I am traveling in the Middle East as we speak (or should that be "write") and have very little time and access to the Internet. I will be back at home on 5 April and with your consent would be more than happy to take a thorough look at the comments and amend them at that time. I fear that at this time I do not have the time to do a thorough enough read-through to fix the issues, even if they are not the largest. Arsenikk (talk) 07:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to fix the issues. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me. I am now passing the article. Congrats to you both! Resolute 17:31, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 27 external links on CC Amfi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:59, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on CC Amfi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:37, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on CC Amfi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on CC Amfi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:CC_Amfi&oldid=1213096913"